Monday 23 March 2015

CPRE and Chiltern Society host Green Belt public meeting Weds 25th, Warden Hill

Dear fellow Bartonians,
I intend to go to the following public meeting, so do let me know if you want/need a lift.
Many thanks,
Janet Nunn
882799

Public Meeting
Protect Our Green Belt!

 
Green Belt land in southern Bedfordshire and northern Hertfordshire is threatened as never before by huge levels of development.

Find out what’s at stake in your community and what
you can do about it.

Speaker: Shaun Spiers, National Chief Executive of Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE)
 

7pm, Wednesday 25th March 2015

Venue: Main Hall, Cardinal Newman Catholic School,
Warden Hill Road, Luton LU2 7AE

All Welcome
This meeting is a joint event by local countryside charities CPRE Bedfordshire, CPRE Hertfordshire & The Chiltern Society.

For more information & directions -
www.cprebeds.org.uk


Wednesday 18 March 2015

To go safely

This month's Focus newsletter hit a few raw nerves. The poor state of roads and footpaths at various points around the village was flagged up also by:
  • Jackie who's concern at the faded marking on the zebra crossing between Gale Court and the surgery. This is used especially by schoolchildren and the elderly on this busy east-west rat-run between the A1 and M1. See photo below. 

I reported it to highways@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk and urge you to do the same if you share the concern. And is this enough or is there a need for a lollipop person (school crossing patrol person) or a traffic light controlled crossing to ensure motorists stop at busy schooltimes? Do let me know your experience.
  • Bob who welcomed support for his long running campaign to have the pavement on the northern side of the Sharpenhoe Road outside number 4 repaired.
  • Ken, who was pleased to hear I'd reported the sunken drains on the southern side of Sharpenhoe Road as one leaves the village going west, then added his own observations of more sunken drains on the bridge crossing the A6 into the village. And I've since been made aware of how deep the drain cover has sunk on the east side of Bedford Road next to the bollard crossing at the village centre end of Manor Road. Clearly motorists keep clear of the bollards but have caused the drain cover to sink, which a (motor) cyclist might not see outside daylight hours.
Email highways@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk or call 0300 300 8049 to report highways problems to Central Beds Council. And please, keep me in the loop with how you get on or for my support.

Janet Nunn
tel: 882799 or e-mail janet.nunn@ntlworld.com

Thursday 5 March 2015

Bartonians' views on housing development


A sincere thank you to all who returned our survey to tell us what you think is the best way forward for housing development around here and in the country more generally.

There is a real appreciation of the need to (re-)develop sites in towns and cities here in the South-East but also in the Midlands and the North. There's also wide support in principle for the idea of developing towns into garden cities where locals support the notion, although several people here thought Ampthill should be excepted.

As for Barton-le-Clay and walks out to surrounding villages, the majority cherished the Green Belt and wish it to be safeguarded. Janet Nunn and Jonathan Paxton thank you for your responses.

1. General - Use of paths around Barton-le-Clay: The vast majority of respondents regularly use our footpaths, but a small handful have developed mobility issues with age and can no longer do so. This highlighted that people who use a wheelchair or mobility scooter also want to gaze on the lovely views around here, yet the staggered fence blocks access to the Bunyan Way footpath east off Manor Road. Can this be made wheelchair friendly?

2. Our most used paths: In order of popularity, these were the paths east of Manor Rd; south from Church or Old road; west towards Sharpenhoe; north from Higham Road. 

3. Bartonians' favourite places: the favourite walks were
a. around Barton-le-Clay: to Hexton; to the springs and up the Barton Hills; to the Sharpenhoe Clappers.
b. around other Beds-Herts villages: in order of popularity, around Silsoe, Pegsdon, Old Warden, Shillington, Meppershall, Clophill, Maulden, Shefford, Pirton, Ashwell, Woburn, Woburn Sands, Harlington, Holwell, Willington, Arlesey, Dunstable Downs, Lilley, Kimpton
c. among towns of Beds and Herts: in order of popularity, Hitchin, Ampthill, Bedford, Luton and its Stockwood and Wardown Parks, Stotfold, Harpenden and its Common, Hertford, Wyboston
d. of Beds, Herts, Bucks cities: MK, Letchworth, St Albans, Stevenage, Welwyn GC, Tring, Aylesbury
e. other: London, Cambridge, Oxford

4. New Housing sites proposed were:
a. in/around Barton-le-Clay: the vast majority said none; two said the infrastructure wouldn't support more growth; one person suggested Faldo Road and west of Barton-le-Clay; one person said 'west of village centre, off Sharpenhoe Rd'; one person said 'on the several available plots around Barton' without identifying any
b. in/around villages of Beds/Herts: people felt strongly that brownfield sites be used and also suggested of Sandridge, Wheathampstead, Wilstead/Wixams, Offley, Cockernhoe and one person saying 'we're not qualified to comment'
c. in/around towns of Beds/Herts: brownfield sites were overwhelmingly urged, citing Stopsley and Luton, especially the old Vauxhall site; inner Dunstable and Houghton Regis near new by-pass; Leighton Buzzard; Stewartby, Kempston; Bedford; corridors along M1-A1M; extension of new sites in Wixams, Silsoe
d. in/around cities of Beds, Herts, Bucks: MK, Luton South, Stevenage, Aylesbury
e. other: general support for brownfield site development; one person said there was 'plenty of room around Bucks villages, but they'd need their transport links improved'.

5. Make certain willing towns on the Oxford-Cambridge axis into Garden Cities:
a. support: most people supported the idea; a handful were unsure; two said 'not Ampthill' and one opposed
b. prefer to grow villages in SE England: two people supported this option and all other respondents disagreed
c. prefer to grow cities and opportunities around UK - the SE has enough: several people supported this proposal, with one person citing how 'North and Midlands towns need better investment and opportunities'; one person said 'by far the best idea'; one person was 'unsure about the SE having enough'
d. other: town regeneration and maintaining villages were the preferred priorities. One person thought Lincs with its low population density had great scope for development.